PR-ready check
Self-review a PR the way a demanding reviewer would.
The prompt
Act as a strict reviewer. Does this change actually do what the PR description claims? Call out untested paths, missing error handling, and anything that would block approval. Why it works
Framing the model as a strict reviewer raises its bar, and anchoring to the PR description surfaces gaps between what you promised and what you shipped.
Fill in
- Paste the PR description (or point at the diff).
Follow-ups
- “Draft the missing test for the untested path you found.”